CO129-113 - MacDonnell - 1866 [5-6] — Page 288

287

#

"The late Governor (Sir George Bonham).

12

Го Jo me

such

aw e

rin 1855 seems

Gammer

Sev

expression by the perfectly careluarios,

when he directed that statement to be mãos he had but the are record to refer to aiz: the plan approved by Sir George Bonham in 1853, which plan does not whibit any Itt fet contour, as part of the Southern Boundary.

113.

Now against the above simple

and convincing induction from admitted facts what has Coloured Sevell to allege,

#

say it is true

د

the actually is drrion to "That on accountofils paper not being " sufficiently large the plan does not show! The Boundaries quite up to the 300 feet

"Contour 15"

14.

This is the first time that I won

heard of a

recorded, agreement for transfer of

property or definition of boundaries being

held to include

the

mare

or the

agreement because if the paper

chan

represented

mi

map annered thereto, on which it was drawn.

had been larger, a greater

area could have

been shown, and would doubtless have been included in the transfer!

1.

I do not thrust it necessary

Spary to deal finiter with such an argument repecially

as it has not been advanced till 1866,

whilst it is opposed to the direct averment

of the Ordnance Offices in 1855- that such

was

not the

cool-

but that on the conti

contrary

the Boundary Bandaries of the Ordnance limits, and

Stones were then the actual